Quote:
Originally Posted by Ch1town
There it is, thank you sir!
Just the proof I needed to send my partner.
Why whould anybody believe that to be wrong? As CoachP substitutes OOB for backcourt... everything sounds correct.
|
It's been discussed ad nauseum, but it's a violation to cause the ball to go OOB, it's not a violation to cause the ball to go BC. It's only a violation to be the first to touch AFTER it goes to the BC.