Thread: Backcourt AGAIN
View Single Post
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Mon Dec 31, 2007, 11:51am
bob jenkins bob jenkins is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,193
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ch1town
There it is, thank you sir!

Just the proof I needed to send my partner.

Why whould anybody believe that to be wrong? As CoachP substitutes OOB for backcourt... everything sounds correct.
It's been discussed ad nauseum, but it's a violation to cause the ball to go OOB, it's not a violation to cause the ball to go BC. It's only a violation to be the first to touch AFTER it goes to the BC.
Reply With Quote