Quote:
|
Originally Posted by cdaref
I dont disagree with this approach. But I prefer to start with 10 then go to 4. Was the contact even a foul under the rules? If so, do ad/disad. Also, keep in mind the concepts contained in the Intent portion. Maybe I shouldnt do my process that way, but I do.
|
Okay, well, either way, what A/D did you see in the OP? Besides the advantage of having a foul called?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by cdaref
Obviously, on the court, you do it in a split second. I'm sure I never in my life will ever talk myself through things like that on the court. There isnt enough time. And the officials that try to do that wind up paralyzed on the court and dont make any calls. I am talking about how I analyze things after the fact when I try to think about calls and situations.
|
Agreed. The thinking we do after the game and then on this board is how we get better. Using it adjust the toggles we flip quickly on the floor.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by cdaref
I think this is an interesting discussion, personally, that leads us to rules analysis and philosophy. I like that stuff.
|
I agree 100%. THis type of thread is this board at it's best.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by cdaref
I still have the foul, but as I said before I would definately post game it with my partner: "did you see that charge I had, what did you have on that?" He may way say "I would have no-called it."  |
And then would your thinking change? Would it depend on the partner? Just curious how your analysis works.