View Single Post
  #23 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 26, 2007, 09:57am
inigo montoya inigo montoya is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 124
Quote:
Originally Posted by BayStateRef
Because both the rule and the casebook refer to "teammates" (plural.)

Your citation is about the extrme...when many teammates (the casebook says four; the rule simply says "teammates") are involved. There is no casebook play...or any rule...that says the count continues if a single screening teammate is involved.

As others have said, the NCAA rule is crystal clear and says the count stops. The Fed rule is murky...and subject to all this debate. I am not the rules interpreter for my board, so I follow his instruction. I have disagreed with his rulings in the past...and probably will again. But on this play...in my games...I will end the count when a single player screen comes between the defender and the dribbler.
So four teammates can't cause a closely-guarded count to end, but one can? If A1 is screened by 1 teammates, with B1 within 6 feet, there is no count. But if A1's three remaining teammates show up, then the count begins? That's absurd.
__________________
Are there rocks ahead? If there are, we all be dead!
Reply With Quote