Of course you don't feel sympathy for Bonds - you probably don't like him either (an opinion many share that has been formed by the media). Pointing out a few articles doesn't compare to the years devoted to hunting down evidence on Bonds.
Here is part of what Heyman says about Bonds being a winner:
"The point is drilled home again that he was far from the only user."
Meanwhile, this is part of what is said about Clemens, the loser:
"He is a superstar who's used to folks fawning at his feet, and 2) As an all-time great..."
On the surface it may seem as though he is getting the same treatment, or worse, as Bonds, but I think you should review the last 5 years or so; Clemens has a lot of catching up to do!
Any talk of putting an asterick on any of Clemens' Cy Young awards?
