View Single Post
  #57 (permalink)  
Old Sat Dec 15, 2007, 03:38pm
SanDiegoSteve SanDiegoSteve is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lakeside, California
Posts: 6,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by GarthB
2. You stated: "I would rather have cheaters in the game than quitters like the Falcon's Patrino, or dog killers like Vick." I'm amazed that you would tolerate cheating under any circumstances and more amazed that you think there should be a choice made amongst activities, all of which should are harmful to the activity.
If given the choice of having to pick 1 of the 3 choices, yes, I would take cheaters over quitters or dog killers. Which would you choose? I don't condone cheating, but if faced with an either/or situation I would choose the cheaters over the other two choices.

Give me a Ken Caminitti over Patrino any day. At least Ken was trying, and always gave it his all. He may have been a druggie, but he never quit.

Give me Barry Bonds over Michael Vick too. Vick is scum and got off easy with 23 months. He'll do 18, get out, then play football again most likely. He should have gotten a much longer sentence.
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25