[just another ref]

Originally Posted by rainmaker

The part I set off in red said that the announcers saw it as a travel and joked about it. But announcers are notoriously wrong about the rules, and so my point was that their agreement that it was a violation was not a good indication that the NCAA is lax about travelling. I tried to say it sarcastically by putting in the rolleyes icon, but I guess it didn't get the message across.

I'll try it more directly: Just because the announcers think there was a travel, doesn't mean there was one. So their pronouncements give no indication of how the NCAA wants the travelling called.

Did you read my description of the play? I didn't mean it was a travel because the announcer said so. It was a travel because I said so. The unusual part is that it was noticed and commented on by announcers.