Quote:
Originally Posted by GarthB
How can a uniform part that was the only one authorized just two years ago, and still being worn today be "antiquated?" It's not a computer.
We need a better sense of time and history.
|
I think from a function and fit perspective they are antiquated. They key isn't that they were the only authorized uniform pant two years ago. The key is how long they've been the only authorized uniform pant.
Traditionalists hold a lot of power when it comes to changing things. It's true in baseball and football. However, sometimes tradition impedes progress.
My sense of history is fine. Why are you trying to turn this into a fight? I've gone out of my way to be friendly towards those who might like tradition.