View Single Post
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 12, 2007, 12:49pm
JugglingReferee JugglingReferee is offline
Fav theme: Roundball Rock
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Near Dog River (sorta)
Posts: 8,558
Quote:
Originally Posted by Warrenkicker
A and B can't both decline penalties in this play.
What is the rationale behind restricting who can decline and who can't?

Quote:
Once B declines A's penalty B is allowed to keep the ball.
Agreed; this makes the most sense.

Quote:
A, by rule, is forced to accept B's penalty and it will be enforced from the spot of the foul. B gets an untimed down at A-25.
This not does make sense to me.

Since time ran out during the play, and A is winning, B is gaining a huge advantage here. If B2 sees that B1 will not reach the goal line, he can "purposely" clip someone to have one more play - a chance to win. A stopped B short of the goal line despite B's illegal actions. A should be allowed to decline B's clip and end the game.

Quote:
If B doesn't decline the penalty by A then we have offsetting fouls and the down is replayed.
This makes sense.
__________________
Pope Francis
Reply With Quote