Thread: Question...
View Single Post
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Thu Dec 06, 2007, 08:49am
Nevadaref Nevadaref is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,015
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdw3018
A flagrant intentional foul.

And that would be the correct call in my scenario above.

If there was no contact, but you deemed that the player attempted to and felt it necessary you could then assess a flagrant technical, no?
Fouls are either personal or technical, and then CAN be either flagrant or intentional, but not both. So what you need to say above is flagrant personal foul.

Got it?
Reply With Quote