View Single Post
  #62 (permalink)  
Old Sat Dec 01, 2007, 05:58pm
rainmaker rainmaker is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 9,466
Send a message via AIM to rainmaker
Okay, you asked about your other points so here goes....

Quote:
Originally Posted by kbilla
I just re-read them again completely...by definition they don't appear a whole heck of a lot different, "legally placing the body in the path of an offensive opponent" vs. "legal action without contact that delays or prevents an opponent from obtaining a desired position".
I think the biggest difference is that screening is a "set" thing and guarding can be a moving thing.

Quote:
Originally Posted by kbilla
what is different are the requirements for each, most applicable in this thread being that if you are screening there is no need to face the opponent, whereas you must be facing in order to obtain LGP.
and remember that guarding can involve movement where screeining is mainly a stand.

A[QUOTE=kbilla]re you drawing your difference from the fact that A1 didn't "move" into a guarding position, since he/she was already standing there you have a screen? That might be what he's aiming at. But you also need to remember that even if A1 moved, he might not need to conform to LGP. If they're both going for the rebound (which in the OP they were) they just need to maintain their own legal positions. If one moves into the other, that's the one that fouled.

Quote:
Originally Posted by kbilla
What if A1 moved a step to his/her left and B1 slammed into A1's back, what do you have there?
see above.

Quote:
Originally Posted by kbilla
As I posted much earlier, what if B1 saw that A1 was dribbling to a certain spot and B1 got there first with his/her back turned, do you have a pc foul if there is contact? .
I'd say if B1 appeared to be trying to stop the dribbler and just didn't get into position in time, then I'd call it a block. But if he was actually guarding someone else, and just happened to be there, of if he turned backward to shield himself from the contact, that's PC.

Quote:
Originally Posted by kbilla
I realize that I may have been a bit too aggressive applying the guarding principle in the OP, I am just trying to see where you all draw the line....
That's a legitimate thing to do. The aggression will mellow with time.
Reply With Quote