Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Vinski
Well, that is a good point. I was noting that the situation calls it a "simultaneous violation". But you're right; to have a simultaneous violation there has to be 2 violations.
Wouldn’t the answer to OP’s question then be true?
|
I believe the answer to the OP's question is true. The defensive player being in the 2nd spot is not a violation, he can be there if the offense doesn't choose to use that spot. But it is a simultaneous violation for the offense to be in the 1st spot.