Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref
My response was not intended to carry one shred of animosity.
If it came across that way, I apologize.
|
It did not. I just didn't want to seem like I was starting one. Especially since I agree with your basic sentiment as regards the shock of everybody involved.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref
It was meant to signify the shock that the referee would express in learning that the opposing team was victorious. It would certainly make a mockery of the final bit of game action.
I truly don't know the official ruling on this, so there is no way that I could even get into a "fight" about this issue and certainly not with you. You've always been cool. I just would take all measures possible to never serve as the test case which sets the precedent! 
|
Amen! In fact, I'm going to be adding your advice about checking with the book near the end of the game to my game starting today. That kind of notoriety I don't need!