quote:
Originally posted by Mark Padgett:
Bart - I have always used the theory that if the touching is part of a single continuous act of the reach, then you call it. If the defender was "pawing" at the ball even once before the movement that caused the touch, then you call the violation because it was a separate act that happened first. This theory has been supported at two camps I have attended.
Since these were the only two where it was discussed, I guess I can say it's been unanimous. 
I don't understand your reply Mark. Do you mean that if the defender touches the ball after "pawing" do you "T" him or warn him?