View Single Post
  #29 (permalink)  
Old Fri Nov 16, 2007, 03:38pm
JRutledge JRutledge is offline
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,521
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee
But if you do get the first foul, do you now ignore the second foul, no matter how hard the contact is? Or if you do call the second foul, do you call it a T?
Actually I was involved in about 3 situations during camps where we called a foul, then a T following. And you only call the T if the action is intentional or flagrant. The evaluators loved the calls in each situation this past summer. And each situation took place with different evaluators on each game.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee
I'm talking about what used to be the usual situations where double fouls were called--players banging in the post or wrestling off ball. That's what I'm trying to find out.
I understand what you are asking because that is what I was told when I first started. For whatever reason that philosophy has seemed to change in my HS area and the college supervisors camps that I attended seem to take a similar position. And I think the way Tommy talked about this situation is becoming more and more accepted as a "cop out." And as someone else said, if you get the first one, you will likely stop the retaliation from even taking place. If you penalize both you are likely penalizing the guy that was wrong first and in many minds, that is not the right thing to do. I can tell you that is what John Adams told me personally (and my crew of course) when I attended his camp a few years ago for the first time. John is now the National Coordinator after this year. I am sure that philosophy will continue.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote