Quote:
|
Originally Posted by BigUmp56
Then by all means let me explain. Non-consecutive runners would be runners not consecutively on base starting with R1, as in R1, R2, R3, for example. Or in terms you're more accustomed with; non-forced runners. It may not be written in a rule book this way, but common sense and a basic knowledge of English should have been enough for you to understand.
Tim.
|
Jaksa/Roder define and employ the term "consecutive runner". A point of clarification: It is tempting to equate "consecutive runner" to "forced runner", but the two terms aren't quite the same. With R1 and R2, there are consecutive runners but, for example, in the event of an infield fly, they aren't forced runners.
Steven Tyler, why not replace some of the hours you spend posting here with earning the $50 to buy J/R-- and then follow up with the critical step: reading it?