|
I do not have a problem with a manager bringing up a rule which may be relevant to a situation for an umpire to consider in making a call (assuming of course that he brings it up in a civil manner and that his reference is correct). Sometimes, in the heat of battle so to speak, we can forget a little piece of minutiae which can have some bearing, and as long as the coach can provide a reference, I appreciate the help. My primary concern is to get the call right so I do not penalize the kids on the field. It is then up to me, however, to apply the role appropriately and determine what should/should not be done. So, while the coach can present evidence, he does not make the decision, kind of like a lawyer/judge relationship.
As to the play itself, it is totally judgement as to whether the batter's presence hindered the catcher's ability to make the play. If it did, interference and the runner is out because the batter is clearly obligated to get out of the box and out of the way of the play. I called a minors game last night where I brought this up in my post game conference with the teams as something they need to be careful of.
If on the other hand, the catcher goes out of his way to run into the batter to try and draw an interference call in lieu of trying to make the play on the runner, not only do you have no call, but, depending on the severity of the collision, I think you have to consider ejecting the catcher for unnecessary contact along with poor sportsmanship.
The hinge is was the catcher honestly trying to make a play on the runner or not. If yes, interference and the runner is out. If no, no call and a potential ejection.
What tangled webs we weave.
|