Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Nevadaref
Since the POI rule (4-36) does not include double or simultaneous violations, it should still be correct to apply the logic and principle expressed by the original NFHS play ruling for a simultaneous foul when determining the location for the AP throw-in.
|
While I appreciate the logic, I'm not entirely convinced simultaneous violations and fouls should be treated alike. If so, why wouldn't you also go to POI on a simultaneous violation?