View Single Post
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Fri Nov 02, 2007, 01:36pm
RushmoreRef RushmoreRef is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 127
Quote:
Originally Posted by rainmaker
Did she specifically say it was "not" a violation, specifically to that sitch? Or are you extrapolating?
Exact wording was -

"same as #1" which stated -
Quote:
No violation, play on. The provision in 9-9-3 permits the play.
Team control is established when A2 gains possession and lands in the
backcourt.
I'm sure meaning you should insert B2 for A2, but meaning there was no violation....which I believe should change now based on the fact that a throw in ends on a legal touching.

I'll post last year's thread as soon as I find it....

Here it is--

http://forum.officiating.com/showthr...322#post394322
__________________
Do you really think it matters, Eddy?
Reply With Quote