Garth,
Give it up. He will never agree to the same playing field. Everytime you explain your statement as referring to a specific time and activity, he tries to show that it doesn't apply to some other time or activity and considers that some kind of victory.
Bob and weave, bob and weave.
He reminds me of the bloke who thought "doesn't alter" and "yes we alter" in that other thread were synonomous. (I hope I didn't start that thread over again.)
By the way, I'll be in Queens for a conference. Any chance of running into Adam?
|