I have to cast my vote with Camron on this. The Situation 10 interpretation is just plain wrong.
In Situation 6, A2 is in the air with front court status when he/she catches the ball. That meets the 9-9-1 requirement that a team must be the last to touch the ball in the frontcourt and the first to touch it in the backcourt. A2 meets both requirements just before and just after landing in backcourt.
In Situation 10, even though A2 causes the ball to have backcourt status and team A had team control and the ball had front court status, team A is not the last to touch the ball in the front court, B1 is.
Rule 9-9-2 doesn't apply to this situation because it includes the statement "without the ball touching a player in the frontcourt".
|