Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Scrapper1
You are describing what is sometimes called the "cross and toss". But this is not really the NFHS mechanic. The simple fact is that there IS NO SIGNAL for a flagrant foul in NFHS. It's not the intentional signal, because intentional fouls are not flagrant fouls.
|
by definition that is correct, an intentional foul doesn't NEED to be flagrant, but wouldn't all flagrant fouls by definition be intentional? i don't have my book in front of me with the exact wording, but it would stand to reason to me. you are correct though that there is no signal for a flagrant foul per se, i was just making the assumption that if you have a flagrant foul, then it must have been intentional...so you aren't really signaling a flagrant foul, you are signaling that the foul was intentional, and on top of that you have the modifier that it is flagrant, for which there is no signal..