Quote:
|
Originally Posted by SRW
Damnit, Mike, you're not supposed to be the first one to answer! I wanted to get people discussing this one, not killing the thread with the answer as the second post! :P
|
We can still talk about it, since greymule raises some good points.
Clearly, the runner who is advancing without liability to be put out can, under some circumstances, be declared out for committing a violation. The ball is live, and it would not be too difficult to invent a situation where R1 could commit interference.
Why is a LBR violation exempt?