|
Steve, I think it is way too vague. This past year saw quite a few umpires, in spite of being told to not overreact to the changes involving INT by a batter get extremely overofficious with this situation. I've even had people claim that it was INT because the batter DIDN'T make a move to avoid the catcher's throw.
Too much BS. I don't believe there were half the problems involving INT on the batter before ASA started screwing around with the INT rules last year.
|