Quote:
|
Originally Posted by M&M Guy
I'm also  .
In Situation 3 they are saying the touch is a "legal" touch, thus ending the throw-in, then the violation occurs because the players are standing OOB. That would explain why the throw-in is from the spot closest to the violation. |
Which means the clock should start (and "immedaitely" stop)
Quote:
|
But yet a kicked ball violation is not a "legal" touch and doesn't end the throw-in.
|
And the clock doesn't start.
And the catch of a jump ball is not a legal touch (which is why B gets the ball but A gets the arrow).
For the record, I "agree" with the ruling in Situation 3, but I recognize the (apparent) contradictions.