Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Camron Rust
Your approach is getting really old. How about posting a reason the statement is not valid rather implying you don't believe a post and ask them to prove it. If you have reason to believe it untrue, give something more intelligent than "Sigh... Got a definitive rules citation to back that up?". Offer something useful....something that couters the claim.
|
And your reading comprehension seems to be lacking also. If you go back and read what I posted, I agreed with Bob Jenkins that there
DOESN'T seem to be a
DEFINITIVE rules citation because R4-11-2 and R4-11-3 seem to say completely different things, and R6-7-7 and EXCEPTION(c) can be interpreted differently also. I then agreed with the way that Bob interpreted the language.
Imo, there is NO
definitive rules citation to cite, and I have stated such. The language of the rules conflict and is hazy in a situation when both teams commit a foul, and thus can be interpreted differently. Iow, this is
another situation where people interpreting the existing language differently could end up either being right or wrong. I recognize that. You won't. Quite simply, what I won't state is that I am categorically 100% right in
my opinion, like you people are doing.
The lack of a
definitive ruling doesn't seem to stop the infallible ones on this forum from stating that their freaking
opinion of which rule is applicable is the
ONLY true
opinion possible. That's consistent with your collective past postings also, and it sureashell has got old with me too.
I still agree with Bob Jenkins' take and I still refuse to debate the reasons why any further with you and the others like you. It's pointless.