Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee
you're saying my argument is wrong, but the way that jar, Camron and Junior want to call the play is also wrong under current NFHS rules. Correct, weaselboy?
|
No,
not correct. Holy crap, how can such a simple point be so misunderstood?!?!?!
All I was saying was that these two sentences:
1. Team A is on offense.
2. Team B is on defense.
do not entail the following sentence:
3. If team A commits a foul while they are on offense and team B is on defense, that foul had better be an PC or TC foul.
That's it! You seemed to say that if you believe #1 and #2 (which JAR does) then you HAVE to accept #3, and that's simply false. That was my point.
Quote:
|
Or are you saying that you agree that there is no violation in the play that jar outlined?
|
I'm not talking AT ALL about the play JAR outlined. I didn't even read the play that JAR outlined. I'm talking solely about the deduction involved in sentences 1-3.
Good night. I'm done with this thread. It's not worth the freakin' headache.
