Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Scrapper1
How in the world do you go from 1 and 2 to 3?!?! 
You are arguing that the simple fact that there is a defensive team MUST mean that the other team has team control. Nevada and JAR simply deny that premise.
Camron is correct; your logic is flawed in this particular case. |
Yet more semantics, even less worthy as a male body fluid than Meisterbrau after a hard day of commercial fishing.
I'm beyond caring what jar & nevada have to say about this...in your view of the world who is on defense when no team has control?
I'm kinda hoping you'll say neither.