Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Nevadaref
All of us agree that the throw-in has ended and thus the exception granted to any player for violating after catching the ball "during a throw-in" clearly does not apply. However, it is unclear if B2 should be classified as a "defensive player" during this scenario and thus granted an exception for that.
|
I didn't fail to see your argument. I just can't believe that anyone is actually still arguing since that case play came out.
Unbelievable.
You want to have a "defensive" player when there is
NO offense or defense.
Feel free to argue this further. It's a complete waste of time, but go ahead. I'll leave it to you.
I know that Nevada won't call his state rules interpreter to get his take because his opinion is worth more than the interpreter's rulings, but I recommend others reading this thread to do just that.