View Single Post
  #34 (permalink)  
Old Mon Sep 10, 2007, 02:57am
fitump56 fitump56 is offline
In Time Out
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: In a hut
Posts: 911
Send a message via AIM to fitump56 Send a message via MSN to fitump56 Send a message via Yahoo to fitump56 Send a message via Skype™ to fitump56
Quote:
Originally Posted by kylejt
Has anyone defined what exactly what a signal is?

(answer: you can't, so all this is just a waste)
Nope and they won't. To admit to such a simple concept is to admit to deep rooted, long indulged, nonsensical officiating. The Old Guard would rather argue for eons amongst themselves about the ridiculoous than take one, tiny nonegotistical step back and say "Wow, good point, who does define a signal?"

Answer, no one does.

When a coch comes out onyou about this st00pid rule to claim that F1 is in violation by taking "signs" on the rubber, just ask Coach the same thing we have been saying. "what exactly is a signal". He can't answer, why should we?
__________________
"Never try to teach a pig to eat reasonably. It wastes your time and the pig will argue that he is fat because of genetics. While drinking a 2.675 six packs a day."
Reply With Quote