Quote:
|
Originally Posted by rainmaker
Nevada, just to answer your question, even though I think it's ridiculous, yes, I mentioned the case play to Howard. He said it's not applicable to the situation we're discussing. He and I have discussed it two or three different times during this on-going ker-fuffle.
|
Why is the ruling in 4.15.4 Sit A not applicable to the play posed by JAR?
It seems to clearly cover the situation of a player attempting to dribble a second time.
What do you think is ridiculous about the case play?