View Single Post
  #240 (permalink)  
Old Sat Sep 08, 2007, 08:05am
rainmaker rainmaker is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 9,466
Send a message via AIM to rainmaker
Nevada, just to answer your question, even though I think it's ridiculous, yes, I mentioned the case play to Howard. He said it's not applicable to the situation we're discussing. He and I have discussed it two or three different times during this on-going ker-fuffle.

Apparently, YOU are the one who hasn't been reading posts carefully. I have discussed rules with him many times, and been corrected when I am wrong. I said that in at least one of my posts. It's not something that would be a problem for me. The only reason I was "worried about my schedule" (which was a joke, btw) (and which I said in one of my posts, btw) was that he might be annoyed that I was bothering him during his assigning work with silly and pointless little mis-applications of casebook plays. You didn't pick that up in my postings? Others did, which you would have noticed if you'd read them carefully.

and by the way, if state rules interpreters aren't appointed for the purpose of interpreting the rules, then why bother appointing them? If they have no authority, why ask them questions? Oh, right, you don't.