Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Nevadaref
I do not deny that there are some case plays which are inconsistent with the rules. I simply take the position that those case plays are wrong and that the people who wrote them did a poor job of interpreting the text. They eventually should be overturned. It is my opinion that the actual text always carries more weight than some play ruling because that's what the RULE is.
|
If anyone has a copy of the case book handy, doesn't it state somewhere that in the event of an apparent disagreement between the rule book and the case book that the case book interpretation takes precedence? Doesn't it also state that the case book is considered part of the rulebook?