Quote:
|
Originally Posted by David Emerling
So, if the catcher's throw goes sailing out into center field, and R1 advances to 3rd as a result - you would let the play stand as played? Even if it was clear that the batter's "interference" played a role in the wild throw?
|
Not if you have B INT not B-R INT
Quote:
|
What if the defense claims that it was their intent to make a play on R1 because it was their opinion the batter "went" on that pitch (checked swing) and they were anticipating the ball call being reversed to a strike, thus putting the runner in jeopardy? But first, they wanted to make a play on the runner, since time was of the essence.
|
No difference, either you have a "B" or a B-R, depends on the timig of the call Ball Four. Which brings up the very good point of "see them, call them, don't jack around with multi-second wait times".
Quote:
In OBR, it explicitly says that runners need to be aware of such a reversal of calls which would put the runner in jeopardy.
I'm just throwing crap out there. I don't think I would call interference on this either. I just like to think if there is anything that could complicate the situation.
David Emerling
Memphis, TN
|
Oh, about 20 or 30 more things.
