Quote:
|
Originally Posted by BigUmp56
No...................
Tim.
|
So, if the catcher's throw goes sailing out into center field, and R1 advances to 3rd as a result - you would let the play stand as played? Even if it was clear that the batter's "interference" played a role in the wild throw?
What if the defense claims that it was their intent to make a play on R1 because it was their opinion the batter "went" on that pitch (checked swing) and they were anticipating the ball call being reversed to a strike, thus putting the runner in jeopardy? But
first, they wanted to make a play on the runner, since time was of the essence.
In OBR, it
explicitly says that runners need to be aware of such a reversal of calls which
would put the runner in jeopardy.
I'm just throwing crap out there. I don't think I would call interference on this either. I just like to think if there is
anything that could complicate the situation.
David Emerling
Memphis, TN