Quote:
Originally Posted by SanDiegoSteve
Verbal interference is not applicable to OBR. Interference may not be a verbal act by itself.
J/R: "It is not interference if the intent to interfere is soley verbal."
|
This is what I got thrown under the bus for. I wasn't sure what rule set was being used, so I stated the verbal INT on the assumption that it may have been a modified OBR or some another rule set. By no means did I mean to imply that under OBR should the verbal INT be called. That's also why I stated that I didn't think it would have been the correct call.