View Single Post
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Mon Sep 03, 2007, 10:00am
ManInBlue ManInBlue is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 469
Quote:
Originally Posted by SanDiegoSteve
Verbal interference is not applicable to OBR. Interference may not be a verbal act by itself.

J/R: "It is not interference if the intent to interfere is soley verbal."
This is what I got thrown under the bus for. I wasn't sure what rule set was being used, so I stated the verbal INT on the assumption that it may have been a modified OBR or some another rule set. By no means did I mean to imply that under OBR should the verbal INT be called. That's also why I stated that I didn't think it would have been the correct call.
Reply With Quote