View Single Post
  #27 (permalink)  
Old Sun Aug 26, 2007, 11:04pm
Forest Ump Forest Ump is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 323
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mountaineer
And that's McD's fault??? The woman got $600,000 because she put coffee between her knees to remove the LID?? Are you freaking kidding me? This certainly was a frivolous law suit. (IMHO)


I'll write this again for those of you that are hard of reading. The women received third degree burns and required skin grafts. That's not a sunburn. That's not a blister. That's the complete destruction of tissue. All from a cup of coffee. She was in the hospital for eight days.

McDonald’s served the coffee at approximately 190 degrees. McDonald’s admitted coffee at that temperature is “unfit for human consumption”; 190 degree liquid causes third-degree burns within 2 to 7 seconds of contact with skin.

And you think that McDonald's is not liable for causing a permanent disfigurement plus pain and suffering?
Wow!

A frivolous law suit is a judge in DC suing a dry cleaner for $58M for losing his pants. A woman being burned by near boiling coffee from a company that knows it is wrong, is not.

(This really is all I have to say about that)
__________________
"That's all I have to say about that."

Last edited by Forest Ump; Mon Aug 27, 2007 at 02:00am.
Reply With Quote