Quote:
|
Originally Posted by JugglingReferee
I'm glad that you did do this... but what does it say when the league gave you less info than what was in that article, and the statements in that article were largely skewed?
You had the wool pulled over your eyes, and for that I'm sorry that such a thing happened to fellow officials.
|
Is this the first time ever that this league did not support the officials or fudged on one of their policies?
In my neck of the woods, if an association doesn't approve of league actions they simply terminate the contract and go on.
A new association steps in and officials work the games. Leagues shouldn't have to dissolve simply because one association doesn't like what they did.
IMO the associtation should have:
1. Negotiated in private with the association to work out the problems. Not make it a public debate.
2. After negotiating either Honor the contract or
3. Terminate the contract and walk away.
If they terminate the contract they shouldn't care what happens after.
If the association wanted this leagues business they shouldn't have publicly ridiculed them.
When my association picks up a new league I don't research the history of the previous associations dealings with that league, I simply do the games I'm assigned to.