View Single Post
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Tue Aug 21, 2007, 01:08pm
CO ump CO ump is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 179
Quote:
Originally Posted by don't move
Force is only an issue as it relates to the goal line.
I realize that.
My question is:
Do you think rule 6-2-4 intended to penalize K for Rs muff in this situation?
It was clearly Rs muff that took the ball from a zone where K could recover and advance to a zone where K could not retain posession.

Where else in the rules can a muff by the team not in posession have such advantageous results?

Last edited by CO ump; Tue Aug 21, 2007 at 01:11pm.
Reply With Quote