Quote:
Originally Posted by don't move
Force is only an issue as it relates to the goal line.
|
I realize that.
My question is:
Do you think rule 6-2-4 intended to penalize K for Rs muff in this situation?
It was clearly Rs muff that took the ball from a zone where K could recover and advance to a zone where K could not retain posession.
Where else in the rules can a muff by the team not in posession have such advantageous results?