Originally Posted by Interested Ump
Only on pitches that are close. It's a good verbalization and it sets close commo between F2 and PU. I am happy to see this officiating strategy is being endorsed, finally, after having used it for years on years.
Good for B too, if he asks with humility and total politeness
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by PeteBooth
The problem I have with giving location is that we are going to miss'm. It's called being human
Therefore, if you did "kick" a pitch and said for example "IN" and then the exact same pitch is called a strike would lead to a credibility issue.
If you are going to give location and do "kick" one are you going to admit that "you missed it" so that both F2 and B1 know that the next pitch in the same location will be called differently?
P.S. edited
This goes both ways, if I call a strike that should have been a ball, flip the commo to suit.
Mechanics seem to change every year and sometimes the "old" teachings are still prevalent.
I do give location but only on rare occassions.
Pete Booth
|
Yes, I admit to missing calls when I have good commo with a catcher. If he is good, he will know that he is going to get an occasional miss and that we may not agree on strike/ball locations either. It's a commiseration almost like a dance
Seriously, I will discreetly let F2 know, at the right time, that I missed it and he gets the next one there in the same location. I encourage him to tell his P, he needs to know what the heck is going on too.
I don't like missing plate calls and don't understand why there should be great difficulty in calling an accurate plate if you are experienced and the quality of play is high. Missing ball and strike calls tees me off, F2 sees that or at least I sure hope.
PS. Edited
If I miss a ball, called a strike, flip the above commo and customize to suit.
