Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Scrapper1
1) Why does Stern need any justification to start an investgation? 
2) What could be in the collective bargaining agreement that would prohibit Stern from having somebody watch security tapes from a casino? |
1. Don't you think any union would raise a stink if the employer was initiating an investigation based on hearsay? The fact that a guy who admits to betting on his own games and giving out confidential inside information to gamblers says these guys were in a casino is hearsay.
2. Valid question. I don't know. Some sort of due process clause, perhaps. I'm not saying it's there, only that it's possible.
3. I still don't expect to see 20 guys get fired over this.