Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ManInBlue
Not everything I wrote was wrong - A foot on the line IS considered in the lane.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Steven Tyler
You're still wrong. Both feet have to be inside the running lane. Neither foot can be touching outside the lines. It wouldn't be a running lane if you are allowed to run outside of it even with a [i]foot touching outside the lane.
|
How is what he said still wrong? I didn't read him saying running with one foot outside (to the left of) the foul line is not a violation.
Official Notes - Case Book - Comments: The lines marking the three foot lane are a part of that “lane” but the interpretation to be made is that a runner is required to have both feet within the three foot “lane” or on the lines marking the “lane.”
Tim.