View Single Post
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Sat Aug 11, 2007, 01:35pm
IRISHMAFIA IRISHMAFIA is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dakota
Try again to bring the interfering with a D3K by the BR rule in line with all other interference rules for a runner.
The D3K INT by BR is already in line with the other rules, and that is the problem.

Quote:

Allow an appeal for an advantageous 4th out on any runner, not just the one who scored.
That was an in-house change in 2003 and I doubt I can get that by because of all the variables ways umpires around the country will apply it (i.e. run scores before the a runner is tagged out for the 3rd out and the BR never touches 1B. I can see an umpire ruling the BR out for entering DBT on an appeal)
Quote:

Add a companion to the metal cleats proposal for a definition of an illegal slide and the penalty - out and ejected, if breaking up a DP, runner being played on is also out.
Those already exist in an umpire's ability to rule USC. However, a definition of "slide" is probably in order.
Reply With Quote