data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fd859/fd8599c1127d5cf77801739b6ffd47a13974af01" alt="Old"
Tue Jul 31, 2007, 10:27pm
|
In Time Out
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: In a hut
Posts: 911
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChucktownBlue
So if a batter catches the ball off the end of the bat, and it squirts over towards the on-deck batter (in the air), and he catches it, that's interference? The ball hasn't yet settled on foul ground....
|
Correct.
Quote:
The OP is all about the judgement of the umpire. A ball which can't be played on, as in the OP, is foul, in my judgement. Every umpire has his own judgement. Apparently, some of these judgements are much bettr than others!
|
Correct. The proper, technical judgment is the ball has been INT with.
__________________
"Never try to teach a pig to eat reasonably. It wastes your time and the pig will argue that he is fat because of genetics. While drinking a 2.675 six packs a day."
|