Quote:
Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee
The concept might be reasonable but we'd need a rule change or case play to do something like that. Right now, we can only make time timing corrections when the timer makes a mistake. In this particular situation, the timer did not make a mistake; he folloed the rules.
|
See there's the problem; if you're going to allow a timer to do that to the rules, anarchy reigns.
Anyway, didn't the timer make a mistake by starting the clock
after a violation occured? They might not have been sure it was a violation, which is why they did their job by starting it. But we can tell them it was a violation, and correct the timing error.