Quote:
|
Originally Posted by JRutledge
Whether we like it or not, officiating is a very subjective thing. All we have here are two officials that disagree on what needs to be called or how to navigate the game.
Peace
|
I think I understand what you are trying to say, but I disagree. We've all had observers tell us differing philosophies at times and we just figure out which ones work best for us and move on.
However, what we have here, obviously, is assignors who are saying to completely ignore the rules (and a directive) and take the easy way out.
Don't call an obvious travel because it might "interrupt the game" and get you yelled at even if it is is a travel (and a directive). Let the players commit illegal moves to avoid taking away a basket in transition.
Do penalize a player by calling a travel, even if they haven't violated, because it's the easy way out and you won't get yelled at.
It would be nice if the NCAA would start some oversight on assignors and get rid of the ones that are encouraging games to be called in ways that conflict with what the NCAA is trying to get some consistency on.