I've read through the old threads. There is credible evidence/situations discussed there that make sense of the new rule. The one in particular: A is granted ball via AP. B kicks ball on attempted throw-in.
Old rule: AP changes to B.
New Rule: AP stays with A.
On next attempted throw-in, team A fouls B before ball is legally entered. Under the old rule, B would get ball via the foul AND get next AP. Under new rule, B would get ball for foul, A would keep AP as they never had chance to complete the AP throw-in.
Thanks for helping me reason through.
__________________
All of us learn to write in the second grade. Most of us go on to greater things.
|