Thread: Smittyisms
View Single Post
  #66 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jul 18, 2007, 08:49am
lawump lawump is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 605
Quote:
Originally Posted by PeteBooth
Even IR isn't conclusive some-times. For the most part the initial IR tells us nothing. It's not until the networks use the SUPER-SLO MO camera angles and even then it's hard to tell some-times.

Personally I think the game has changed for the worse. This getting the call right business is way over-hyped and IMO is ruining the game.

Umpires are going to make mistakes. In addtion, subscribing to Jim's theory adds more consistency to the game meaning it's called the EXACT same way for both teams.

I am not in the major leagues but I have a math theory that works for me.

Good Quality throw beats the runner by several steps + Tag where it is supposed to be = OUT whether its yesterday, today or tomorrow. It's the same for both teams so no-one is gaining an advantage.


NOTE: We are not talking about Bang bang or coin flip type plays.

As with most of these type discussions to each his own.


Pete Booth
Pete,

Let me say first, that I agree with your "math theory" (LOL)...as I stated above: that is how I was taught at umpire school.

I agree that IR isn't always conclusive...but many times it is. As a result (as you acknowledged) that is why MLB umps have changed (in a lot of ways). That's all I was stating.