Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Old School
Okay, now we are starting to get there. Key word here is they get to do it again on the endline play. The issue is resolved right then and there. There is no deferring it for another held/jump ball that could occur 10 minutes later.
|
Yes, so what is your point? The AP arrow is, by nature, for a throw-in in the future. After the initial jump ball to start the game, team A gets first possesion, and the arrow will be pointed to team B. It could point to team B
all game long if we have the right situations happen. So what?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Old School
The possession needs to be determined now just like the endbound priviledge was retained for the inbound now.
|
It is. The posession is a TI for the kicking violation. It is determined right at that instant. What is your point?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Old School
At some point in time, the ball is going to be legally touched or a foul oocurs.
|
Cool, let's examine this. A1 has the ball for a APTI. While he's holding the ball, B1 holds A2 inbounds, trying to keep A2 from getting open. A is not yet in the bonus. What happens, and why?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Old School
Deferring rules, successive APTI, normal violations that turn into double jeopardy, oh my.....what's the world coming too!
|
Nothing, because none of this is happening, except in your mind.