Thread: Natural Stance
View Single Post
  #17 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jul 03, 2007, 11:51pm
fitump56 fitump56 is offline
In Time Out
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: In a hut
Posts: 911
Send a message via AIM to fitump56 Send a message via MSN to fitump56 Send a message via Yahoo to fitump56 Send a message via Skype™ to fitump56
Quote:
Originally Posted by cbfoulds
If your "crouch" is such that pitches at the level of your head can be plausibly called strikes "because of it" [the "crouch"], then it sure as he!! isn't A "natural stance", however "natural" it may feel to you.

When I have a batter that assumes an exagerated "crouch" at the plate, I am forced to improvise the top end of my strike zone. I am likely to choose what I THINK a batter of the same aproximate size might be expected to swing at standing "normally".
When umpires begin to determine how a batter should position vertically in the box, they are entering an area that they do not belong. What's the big deal? When I question why umpires take such hard-minded approaches, it is usually because they can't get low enough to remain protected by F2. Tuff titties.

Quote:
And, BTW, it's a judgment call, so STFU and swing the bat.
Nice. Eloquently ended. Punctuates your argument exactly.
__________________
"Never try to teach a pig to eat reasonably. It wastes your time and the pig will argue that he is fat because of genetics. While drinking a 2.675 six packs a day."