Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mbyron
No, I'm not saying that. I'm saying (I guess for the third time now) that interference on a foul pop-up is not a double play situation.
Since in the OP, the defense wasn't going to get 2 outs on the play, I'm not going to over-penalize the offense for their infraction by awarding 2 outs.
The only possible reason I can see for arguing that the BR should also be called out is that without interference the fielder would have caught the foul pop-up. True: but then R3 would still be on 3B, not out for interference.
You seem mostly concerned with this statement:
I don't have the MLBUM, but it seems to me that this rule is intended to make the defense "whole" (to use lawyerspeak) when they might have had a double play. This rule says that the base is not safe haven for runners who interfere, and that the usual penalty for illegally breaking up a double play applies.
I do not interpret this clause as applying to a pop-foul.
|
Again, you use common sense.
None of us umpires are served by hypotheticals that defy common sense.